Thursday, 8 December 2011

Testing Shoulder Mobility

In a recent post I discussed the importance of movement, or more specifically, the quality of your basic movement patterns with respect optimal performance and injury prevention.  In that post I discussed the Lunge and 1 Leg Squat patterns. In this post I will shift the discussion to the shoulder. 

Proper function and mobility of the shoulder is of course critical for any sport or occupational activity that requires use of the upper extremity, but because many of the muscles also attach into the neck, shoulder problems can also be a source of neck pain.  In this post I will cover three key movement screens for the shoulder, the Overhead Reach, the Posterior Reach, and the Cross Body Reach.  As their names imply, these screens basically test you ability to reach in different directions.  This is critical.  Just think how often you use your arms to reach for various things throughout the day or consider motions of the arms and shoulders during sports such as golf, swimming, or tennis.  These three tests provide a quick and easy, but also extremely effective method to test these motions. 

Remember, as discussed in the first post in this series, using movement screens are extremely sensitive in detecting movement problems and muscle imbalances but are not always sensitive to exactly which muscle or joint is responsible for the dysfunctional pattern.  This is because the movements are simultaneously testing the coordinated function of various body segments (in this case the upper arm, shoulder blade, and the upper spine).  A problem such restricted flexibility or weakness anywhere along the chain can create a dysfunctional movement pattern. Furthermore, problems at different areas will often create similar looking patterns. Therefore, a clean test clears several structures with one simple motion, but a failed test means a little more work is required to isolate the problem.  In the clinic we are able to break the dysfunction pattern down further to zero in on the key problem, but this can get a bit complicated and is beyond the scope of this particular post, so to keep things I will try to point out the most common causes of each dysfunctional patter.

The Overhead Reach Test

All of the tests discussed in this post are designed to test the mobility and muscular coordination of the upper quarter, particularly the shoulder blade and shoulder joint itself.  This test can be done in the seated or standing position, and is performed by simply reaching one arm up from the side of your body towards your head as far as is comfortable.  This motion challenges the flexibility of the shoulder muscles (rotator cuff, pecs, triceps and latissimus dorisi) and the shoulder joint itself.  In addition, it tests the ability of the shoulder blade to slide up on ribcage, which requires mobility and muscle balance of the scapula-thoracic muscles.  

First off, this test should not be painful, so if you get pain with this something is definitely not working properly.  You should get this checked out by a qualified professional.  Assuming there is no pain, the upper arm should be able to reach your ear, but this alone does not constitute a clean test.  While having full overall mobility is important, it is equally important that the motion is coming from the right areas, and approximately one third of this motion should come from the shoulder blade.  A quick way to asses this is to look at the angle formed between the medial edge of the shoulder blade and vertical in the end position of the test.  This angle should be approximately 60 degrees.

If you can reach the full end range position with the scapular in the proper position you have passed this test.  If you cannot reach the full end position it means there is a mobility restriction or strength imbalance somewhere along the chain.  If the scapula has rotated fully and the arm is not able to reach your ear, or if the arm is able to reach the ear but the scapula has rotated beyond 60 degrees the restriction is most likely in the shoulder itself, probable the rotator cuff or shoulder joint capsule.  In the latter case the hyper-mobility of the scapula is masking the shoulder restriction, a situation I refer to as a movement compensation.  Keep in mind that symmetry is also important.  So even if you are able to comfortable reach the end position of the test on both sides, if you can reach farther on one side you may still have a problem.

The Posterior Reach

The Posterior Reach is basically the opposite of the Overhead Reach, and can again be done in the seated or standing position.  To perform this test reach one arm back behind the body and slide your hand up your back towards your opposite shoulder blade. This motion challenges the flexibility of the rotator cuff (infraspinatus, teres, major, supraspinatus) as well as the pec major and shoulder capsule. 
Again, the test should not be painful.  Assuming there is no pain, under normal circumstances you shojde be able to reach your fingers to your opposite shoulder blade.  Just as we saw with the Overhead Reach, it is important that the motion is coming from the right areas. It is common that the medial edge of the shoulder blade will lift off the ribcage.  This is a sign that the shoulder in compensating for a tight shoulder (the shoulder blade is moving too much to compensate for the restricted shoulder.  This helps get the arm back behind the body but leaves the shoulder blade unstable.  

If you can reach the full end range position with the scapular in the proper position you have passed this test.  If you cannot reach the full end position it means there is a mobility restriction somewhere along the chain, almost always in the posterior rotator cuff or posterior shoulder capsule. Again, keep in mind that symmetry is important.  So even if you are able to comfortable reach the end position of the test on both sides, if you can reach farther on one side you may still have a problem.

The Cross Body Reach

The Cross Body Reach tests the mobility of the posterior shoulder as well as the ability of the shoulder blade to slide across the ribcage. For this test you simply need to reach your arm straight across your body. Under normal circumstances you should be able to reach your elbow past you chin to you opposite ear.  Also, your shoulder blade should contribute to this motion.  Look for the shoulder blade to outward around the body as the arm reaches across, and compare the movement with the other side. 

If you can reach the full end range position with the scapula in the proper position you have passed this test.  If you cannot reach the full end position it means there is a mobility restriction, either in the posterior shoulder (posterior deltoid, posterior rotator cuff, posterior shoulder joint capsule), or in the shoulder blade muscles.  I have found that shoulder blade often becomes restricted when scar tissue adhesion accumulate at the upper border of the shoulder blade (between the levator scapulae, traps, rhomboid, and serratus posterior superior).  This essentially glues the shoulder blade to the ribcage. This is common in cyclists, triathletes, and with prolonged computer work.  Breaking the adhesions up with ART (Active Release Techniques) treatment works well for this.  Again, keep in mind that symmetry is important.  So even if you are able to comfortable reach the end position of the test on both sides, if you can reach farther on one side you may still have a problem.

Friday, 2 December 2011

Understanding Repetitive Strain Injuries

Musculoskeletal injuries occur through one simple principle, the load (i.e. the physical stress or strain) placed on an anatomical structure exceeds that structures capacity to tolerate that load.  This seems logical to most people when thinking about traditional sports injuries like ACL tears or ankle sprains.  But what many people don’t realize is that the damaging and excessive loads do not have to happen all at once.  Instead, many injuries are categorized as overuse or repetitive strain injuries, meaning pain and tissue damage are not the result of strain or overload from a single event, but instead occur as the musculoskeletal system is exposed to a large number of repetitive forces over weeks or months. 

Perhaps the most obvious example is distance running injuries (although we could easily use golf, swimming or a number of workplace examples....typing and prolonged computer use are other good examples).  Tissue damage resulting from repetitive overuse is how the vast majority of running injuries occur.   Assuming an average stride rate of 180 steps per minute with a pace of 6 minutes per kilometre, a runner’s feet will strike the ground 1080 times over the course of a single kilometre.  For a 10K run this equates to 10,800 foot strikes.  With typical training programs involving 10K to full marathon distances the number of foot strikes can quickly rise into the millions in just a single month. 

Keep in mind that the musculoskeletal system is stressed with each of these strides, as the body must first absorb the impact force associated with the foot striking the ground, and milliseconds later must generate a propulsive force to propel the body forward.  Although the loads associated with each individual stride are well within the tolerance limits of the musculosleletal system, the repetitive application of these loads can produce a combined fatigue effect over time, resulting in a reduction of the body’s capacity to endure the forces generated with each stride.  If this pattern continues tissue damage can occur, resulting in injury.

Stress, Adaptation, and Over-training

Although repetitive strain injuries are a consequence of repeated musculoskeletal stress, this does not necessarily mean that all stresses are bad.  In fact, some degree of stress is necessary if we want to build strength, speed, and greater endurance.  This is the focus of all strength or athletic training programs, including endurance training for sports such as running. Essentially, the athlete performs an activity which stresses the body.  Although the nature of the specific activity may focus this stress at a different system or anatomical structure (i.e., running will focus stress on different areas compared with swimming or weight training), the intention is the same.  Stimulating a training response will allow the body to more easily meet the demands of that stress the next time it is encountered.
 
Figure 1. Click image to enlarge
This process can be demonstrated by a basic stress-response curve, illustrated in Figure 1.  The vertical axis represents our body’s performance capacity.  For our purposes we can define this simply as our body’s ability to meet a certain demand or perform a certain activity.  In this case to run a certain distance or at a certain speed. The horizontal axis represents time.  As our body is stressed during exercise, tissues breakdown and our energy stores are depleted, resulting in a temporary reduction in our performance capacity.   It is more difficult to meet the demands of the given task.  Then, as the training session ends the body shifts to an anabolic state as it works to rebuild the damaged tissues.  Assuming the exercise session has provided an appropriate stimulus, tissue remodeling processes will result in a temporary increase in exercise capacity, often referred to as a stare of super compensation
If another training session is performed while in this state of super compensation, a workout that is slightly more challenging since our performance capacity is elevated, our body will once again be broken down, and then can once again be built back up to another super compensated state.  The repetition of this process over weeks and months leads to a steady increase in our fitness and performance capacity, and forms the basis for all progressive exercise and athletic training programs. It is how we become stronger, faster, and gain endurance.  

Figure2. Click image to enlarge.
Although on the surface this seems like a simple, straightforward process, there are several variables that must be considered and carefully manipulated within the training program to ensure the desired training effects occur.  First is the training program itself, particularly the timing and the nature of each workout.  To produce the desired training effect it is important that the stress associated with each training session (to stick with our running example, this is usually thought of in terms of volume and intensity), is just beyond what the body is accustomed to experiencing.  If the training session is too easy it will be insufficient to stimulate the body to adapt to a new level of fitness. If it is too hard the body will need an extended time to recover, thus compromising subsequent workouts. 

The timing of each workout is also important.  To create a carry-over from previous training sessions, workouts with the goal of building speed or increased endurance should be timed to coincide with a state of super compensation.  However, it is important to realize that this super compensated state is associated with structural, chemical, and hormonal changes.  These changes have a metabolic cost as the body must expend energy to maintain them.  If the body does not experience another situation which taxes this new level of fitness, the body assumes these adaptive changes are an unnecessary use of energy and will slowly drift back to its previous fitness levels.  Therefore, if too much time elapses between key exercise sessions the ability of the subsequent workout to build on the previous one will be lost.  
                 
On the other hand, performing a strenuous workout too soon may be even more detrimental as the body may not have fully recovered from the previous training session.  This is associated with a training stress being applied to the body while it remains in a state of reduced fitness and exercise capacity.   The training session will further breakdown already damaged tissue.  Unfortunately, just as positive training effects can have a cumulative effect over time so can these negative adaptations.  In this case, it is the tissue damage and diminished capacity to withstand the forces associated with running that build over time.   Eventually the damage will accumulate to a the point where the affected muscle, tendon, or bone can no longer tolerate the demands associate with the activity, culminating in pain and injury.  I often refer to this as passing a symptomatic threshold.  This is the hallmark presentation of overuse injuries.  Pain seemingly occurs out of nowhere, however, as you can see the tissue damage and reduction in exercise capacity has actually been accumulating for some time.  
 
Why It’s Not Just About a Proper Training Plan
               
It is often believed that repetitive strain injuries occurring in athletes are a result of training errors (i.e. over-training).  The volume and intensity of training simply exceeds the body’s capacity to recover.  Based on the stress-response curve outline above this may seem like a logical assumption, however, the fact is that training errors alone cannot account for the majority of these injuries.  To be clear, this is not to say that following a proper training program with carefully planned workouts and recovery periods is not critical.  In fact, failure to do this will almost certainly lead to over-training and injury.  However, the reverse is not necessarily true.  For example, many runners will carefully follow a proven training plan, a plan that has been successfully utilized by countless other runners, yet still become injured.  Why is this?  What is it that would prevent one runner from training as hard, as long, or as often as another runner of similar stature and ability before developing an overuse injury?  This is where biomechanics come in.
               
Figure 3. Click image to enlarge.
Simply stated, we can think of biomechanics as your quality of motion, i.e., how your body moves during complex activities.  How the body moves is a critical factor with respect to repetitive strain injuries because it determines how forces are absorbed, distributed, and generated throughout the body.  To better understand the importance of proper biomechanics let’s keep in mind that the basic stress-response curve could theoretically represent any number of elements, such as the aerobic or anaerobic energy system, or a given muscle, tendon, joint, or bone.  In fact, with each workout or training cycle, each system or structure would have its own stress-response curve (Figure 3).  This has profound consequences with respect to injury, as it is possible that multiple areas of the body could be experiencing positive adaptation and improved performance capacity over time, yet other areas may be undergoing an over-training effect.  For example, classic symptoms of over-training include symptoms of fatigue and diminished performance as signs that the body is failing to properly adapt the training program.   These symptoms tend to be related primarily to poor adaption of your energy system and endocrine system, but not necessarily your musculoskeletal system. 
                
When the body moves in a less than optimal - in other words, there are faulty biomechanics and poor quality of movement -  it alters how forces act on the body.  For example,  recall that with each running stride an impact force is generated between the foot and the ground, and that this force will travel up the leg though the foot and ankle, knee, hip, and finally into the spine.  Under normal circumstances, the dissipation of this force is shared between the various body segments.  However, faulty biomechanics driven by problems such as tight or weak muscles can alter this normal force dissipation, causing stress to be concentrated at a particular anatomical structure or region.  Due to the repetitive nature of running and other athletic activities, even a minor biomechanical problem can had profound effects as the altered loading pattern is repeated millions of times in the course of training, eventually culminating in injury to the overloaded area.  All of this is often going on behind the scenes even as notable improvements in strength and endurance are occurring. 

Preventing Repetitive Strain injuries
                 
One of the real problems with repetitive strain injuries is that although they slowly develop over time, this development is often not associated with any obvious early symptoms or warning signs.  But this does not mean there is nothing that can be done to help prevent these injuries.  Keep in mind that prevention of this type of injury really calls for a load management strategy.  So first and foremost, as suggested above, it is critical that you follow a proper training program that includes proper rest intervals (and yes, for some of you Type-A exercise addicts... you need to actually abide to these recovery days, they are there for a reason).  Second, work on improving your biomechanics.  Uncovering biomechanical problems does not have to be difficult (see the previous post on Movement Pattern Screening), but it does need to be done... you can’t correct a problem until you know that it’s there.  Often this can be just a matter of adding some key stretches or exercises to your routine.  We commonly do this type of thing in our clinic (click here for more info), but if you are not in our area look up a good trainer or movement based therapist.  If you need some help with this www.ActiveRelease.com is a good place to start.  ART® is a great hands on soft tissue technique that is geared towards the type of soft tissue pathologies seen with repetitive strain injuries.  Practitioners certified in this technique also tend to be well versed in biomechanical assessment.

Monday, 28 November 2011

Testing Movement Quality - The Role of Movement Patten Screening Tests

For athletes, fluid and unrestricted movement is critical for both optimal performance and to minimize injury. Unfortunately, most athletes seldom consider the importance of proper movement.  It is more common to think in terms of ‘what muscle am I stretching or strengthening’, as opposed to ‘what movement am I training’.... or in the case of bad form, ‘which poor movement am I creating?’  Remember, practice makes permanent.  Only perfect practice makes perfect. 

For anyone that has spent any time around infants or young children you know that many developmental milestones are related to movement.  Learning to roll over, crawl, stand upright, walk, climb, and run are all important events in a child’s life.   With each of these stages the infant is not only getting bigger and stronger but is developing motor programs, which can be thought of as little software programs being installed onto the giant hard drive we call the brain.   These programs are how the body learns to move and interact within its environment.

Through the years as we grow and develop our bodies continue to refine and build these motor programs into a set of basic movement patterns which form the basis for all complex movements throughout life.  In fact, even as we look at the seemingly infinite ways the body moves with sports such as golf, swimming, baseball, or track and field, all of these movements are really just combinations and subtle varieties of a base set of movements.  For example, running is a combination of a 1 Leg Squat and a Lunge.  To throw a fastball we are using the Lunge, Twist, and Push patterns. 

This manner of organizing movements actually simplifies things.  From a clinical perspective, instead of testing and evaluating an infinite variety of movements to identify mechanical problems that may be compromising performance or creating an injury we are able to focus our assessment on the basic movement patters that are most pertinent to each athlete or injury pattern.  Since these basic patterns from the foundation for more complex movements, problems seen during these basic patterns will also carry over into sport specific movements.  For example, a runner who demonstrates an instability at their hip or knee during a lunge or 1 Leg squat will display a similar problem during the stance phase of their running stride (this carry-over has actually been proven by recent research (1)). These patterns also need to be considered from a training perspective, and should be worked into strength and exercise programs, i.e. ‘train movements not muscles’.

A Word of Caution

Keep in mind that although these basic movement patters are extremely sensitive in detecting movement problems and muscle imbalances, they are not always able to discern exactly which muscle or joint is responsible for the dysfunctional pattern.  This is because the movements are simultaneously testing the coordinated function of various body segments.  A problem such as a restricted joint or a tight muscle anywhere along the chain can create a dysfunctional movement pattern. However problems at different areas will often create similar looking patterns, especially to the untrained eye.  In the clinic we are often able to break the dysfunction pattern down further to zero in on the key problem with additional tests, but this can get a bit complicated and is beyond the scope of this particular post.  Therefore, when describing the tests (we will look at the 1 Leg Squat and lunge Tests in this post, I will save the other for upcoming articles) I will try to discuss the most common problems that cause the various movement dysfunctions, but keep in mind these are not necessarily a definitive list.  Also keep in mind that although there is really only one ‘normal’ pattern, there are numerous subtle varieties of dysfunction patterns that are possible based on the underlying muscle or joint problems, or combinations of problems.  Again, I will present the most commonly seen patterns of dysfunction.

The Lunge Test (Figures 1 & 2)

The first basic movement pattern we will look at is the Lunge Test.  This pattern is seen with walking as well as running (including any sport that involves running, not just distance running). To perform this test, begin in a relaxed standing position and lunge forward while bending your trail knee towards the floor.  The length of your step should be approximately the length of your leg.  Do this in front of a mirror or have someone help you note your body position during the end position of the lunge movement.  A normal test is one in which your hip and knee are aligned overtop of your foot (seen from the front view), and your trunk remains upright with your knee at or almost to the floor (seem from the lateral view)
There are several dysfunction patterns that are commonly seen with the lunge.  From the front view, the knee will often shift inward, disrupting the normal alignment of the lower extremity.  This is most often caused by weakness of the posterior hip muscles (gluteus maximus, piriformis/deep external rotators).  Other common patters seen are a forward trunk lead, or failure to keep the lead foot flat on the ground. A trunk lean is usually due to tight hip flexors (this blocks the normal extension of the hip joint so the trunk must lean forward to get the thigh back behind the body), or alternatively, weakness of either the gluteus maximus or hamstring (both of these muscles must work to hold the pelvis and trunk upright, so if they are weak the trunk will fall forward as a continuation of its forward momentum.

With respect to the lead foot, if the heel lifts off the ground it is often a sign of a tight ankle.  Lifting the heel allows the lower leg to pivot over the toes instead of the ankle, allowing the knee to continue its forward motion.  However, this pattern can also occur with a weakness of the glute or hamstring muscles.  In this case the body is using the ankle to decelerate the body as it cannot use a weak glute or hamstring.  Another sign of this is when the body pushes back out of the lunge position the toes will stay on the ground longer than the heel. Normally the foot should lift off all at once and the push back should be crisp and easy. 




1 Leg Squat Test

The second basic movement pattern we will look at in this post is the 1 Leg Squat.  This pattern can be easily recognized in a number of daily activities (walking, climbing stairs) and athletic actions (running, jumping, cutting manoeuvres).  Basically any situation where one foot is on the ground and the other is in the air can be linked to this pattern

To perform the 1 Leg Squat Test, simply begin in a standing position, raise one knee into the air so you are balancing on one leg (referred to as your stance leg), and then squat down toward the floor.  You should do this in front of a full length mirror so you can see you pelvis and stance leg as you do this.  A normal test is one in which the pelvis remains level or slightly elevated on side opposite the stance leg, with the hip, knee, and foot staying aligned over one another.  Any deviation from this position is an indication of dysfunction.  

When pelvis drops on the side opposite the stance leg it is most commonly caused by a strength or coordination problem in the lateral hip muscles (particularly the gluteus medius or gluteus minimus) on the stance leg side, or a problem in the lateral abdominal muscles on the free leg side.  The other common cause of this pattern is a mobility restriction in the calf and ankle.  Basically as the ankle reaches its end range of motion the hip and trunk drop down in an attempt to lower the body further towards the floor (i.e. the pelvic drop is compensating for the restricted ankle).

The other common dysfunction pattern seen with the test is a collapse of the entire lower extremity.  This is similar to the dysfunctional pattern seen in the front view of the Lunge Test. This pattern often results form a strength or coordination problem in the posterior hip muscles (piriformis/deep external rotator group, gluteus maximus), but can also stem from weak lateral hip muscles, or a collapsed arch in the foot.

What's Next...

Hopefully this post helped you to not only understand the importance of proper movement patters, but also in helping you test your own movement patters for common patterns of dysfunction.  If you tests looked clean great... but if not, remember problems seen with these tests are likely to cause problems with respect to performance and efficiency, as well as with injury, so get any problems fixed asap.  I presented only 2 patters here... I will include the remaining tests in upcoming posts, so stay tuned.

References

1) Whatman, C., Hing, W., & Hume. (2011). kinematics during lower extremity functional screening tests. Are they reliable and related to jogging? Physical Therapy in Sport, 12, 22-29.